Max Sackheim AdIncredibly, Max Sackheim wrote this ad ninety years ago for the Gloucester Fisherman, Frank E. Davis.

The company’s sales exploded after Max’s ad debuted and it served as the prototype for mail order food products to come later like: Omaha Steaks, Saltwater Farm’s mail order lobsters and Texas Ruby Red Grapefruit.

The folksy seafarer’s tone of Frank Davis, a real Gloucester fisherman, accounted as much for the success of the ad as the strong copy and offer.

Filed under Copywriting Swipe File by  #

Seven Deadly Advertising MistakesThomas Aquinas spelled out the Seven Deadly sins or vitia capitalia (capital sins) in the 13th Century.

Pride, covetousness, lust, envy, gluttony, anger, and sloth. (I’ve only nailed down four of these within the last hour.)

800 years later, Max Sackheim is sitting in his office on 5th Avenue trying to come up with a great headline for a full page display ad for his ad agency.

What does he do? He smartly swipes Aquinas.

And thanks to Saint Thomas, Max not only gets the seed for a great headline but the whole structure of his ad. Click here for this behemoth of an ad.

A Google search of “seven deadly” mistakes reveals this is heavily swiped.

Here’s a few results I found based on this versatile headline.

  • Seven Deadly Mistakes Presenters Make
  • Seven Deadly Web Development Mistakes
  • Seven Deadly Home Buying Mistakes

This is a headline that’s always going to have juice because of the magic of the number seven and the proof mechanism built into the headline. See Max Sackheim’s earlier home run ad here.

With some stylistic updates, there’s hardly an advertiser today who couldn’t profit from a careful read of this ad.

Ask Yourself These Questions About Your Advertising

1. Does it give the reader a reason for NOT reading?
2. Are we using headlines that whisper sweet nothings?
3. Are we using pictures that do not talk?
4. Is our advertising cursed with cleverness?
5. Does our approach go around Robin Hood’s barn?
6. Do our advertisements leave ‘em dangling?
7. Do our advertisements contain “Yackety-Yack” copy?

Why should anyone read your advertising? Is it NEWS? Does it PROMISE anything of importance for the reader? Or is it just “another ad?”

Why should anyone believe your advertising? Are you really convincing – or just “talky?”

Why should anyone do anything about your advertising? Do you give them a chance – or do you leave them high and dry?

Can we get a hallelujah for Max?

Filed under Copywriting Swipe File by  #

Real Estate Agent Biz-Dev MailingThe economic turmoil taking place today affords savvy marketers a great opportunity to win the hearts and minds of their prospects, yet few have the courage to take it.

Case in point is the teaser copy on this mailing, offering business development for real estate agents.

The headline: “Learn How to Make More Money Every Month Selling Real Estate While Working LESS Hours”

The sub-head is classic duck-and-cover.

“Inside Is Everything You Need to Know to Finally Start Generating, Working With And Closing All the Prospects You Need — Even In This Challenging Market.”

Challenging is one of those timid words marketers use when they don’t want to say the word: “PROBLEM.”

It’s also a word that causes the needle to wiggle on most peoples’ B.S. meters.

Now, the guy who mailed this piece is an accomplished marketer.

He knows as long as new real estate agents are in the game, they’re fanatical about making money as realtors. Almost to the point they’d ignore a sack stuffed with $100 thousand on their desk in favor of receiving a call for a listing appointment.

But the problem is the exodus of realtors from the profession is so massive, he’s not even close to the wavelength they’re on. With an 11 year inventory of condos in places like Miami, no positive thinking…no coaching club will keep newcomers meaningfully in the game.

There’s blood in the streets and everyone knows it.

And that’s the golden opportunity.

Come right out and admit the market is terrible and only getting worse. Not only that, most realtors reading this mail piece will be long gone by this time next year.

Then follow up with the promise.

One of the best examples we have of the effectiveness of the damming admission followed up by a powerful, provable advertising claim comes from the brilliant ad writer and Antarctic explorer, Ernest Shackleton.

Shackleton published the following zinger of a recruitment ad in the London newspaper, The Times, on December 29, 1913.

Men wanted for hazardous journey. Small wages. Bitter cold. Long months of complete darkness. Constant danger. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.

The ad brought in around 5,000 applications virtually overnight.

Our prospects are smart. As long as we tell it straight, we marketers have nothing to fear no matter if there’s blood in the streets. After all, they’re counting on us for hope…and band aids.

Clairol Ad (by Shirley Polykoff)

(The following is a 40+ year old article on one of the great women copywriters, Shirley Polykoff. She was #24 on Advertising Age’s top 100 of the 20th Century and also one of the highest paid ad writers of the 1950’s and 1960’s. Though she wrote (and sloganeered) for giant corporate clients, her style was direct response at heart.)

Advertising: A Blonde Who Has More Fun

She likes the right copy that sells for Clairol.

Last month, Rosser Reeves told the Advertising Writers Association of New York that it should give its awards for ads that sold the product and not for mere excellence in creativity.

The Ted Bates chairman, speaking at the association’s awards banquet, mentioned a number of campaigns that he believed should have been honored, but were not. On the top of his list was Shirley’s Polykoff campaign for Clairol – “Does she …or doesn’t she? Hair color so natural only her hair dresser knows for sure.” Mr. Reeves documented his argument by pointing out that the campaign was so successful in selling the product that today Clairol spends more on advertising then Bristol-Myers original paid for the whole Clairol Company, the Clairol advertising budget is $36 million.More on Shirley Polykoff: Blonde Copywriters Have More Fun

Filed under Blog by  #

Gene Schwartz The following comes from a five page story entitled, “The Creators,” in The Capitalist Reporter circa 1975. The article covered three of the world’s greatest mail order copywriters. Paul Michael and Joe Karbo were the other two writers, besides Gene Schwartz.

When copywriter Gene Schwartz decided to go ahead with the promotion of the book Sex May Be Dangerous to Your Health, his staff, he says, “wanted to throw me out the window.” And just how bad they felt about the spreading about such a rumor is evidenced by the fact Schwartz’s offices are 11 floors above Madison Avenue.

Schwartz grinned, took another gulp of coffee and said he didn’t concur with the thesis of the book either. “My staff and I were in agreement. We all think sex is marvelous”.

“The point is, if a person has an idea which is kooky, not correct, who’s to say he has no right to be heard?”

Along the lines of that belief, Schwartz has written promotional copy for, and published books by past presidents of the American Medical Association and by chiropractors – who are mortal foes of one another indeed.

Schwartz was discussing one of the oldest questions about advertising and about those who, like himself, write advertising copy: is it ethical and what are his own ethics?

First, he says, he won’t do anything illegal. “Controversial, yes. Illegal, no”

Then, he won’t write ads for bad products – or ads that in themselves are bad. The latter he compared with being an athlete who to win must stay in shape. It’s just the same in copywriting, he says. If you loose your honesty – and if you break these rules you do – you can’t write good ads again, any more than an athlete who allows himself to get out of training can hope to win a gold medal.

It was not all that long ago that Schwartz was broke and his ethics put to the test: He was offered $7,000 to write promotional material for a land deal. He turned down the offer he says, because he didn’t believe in the proposal put forth by the man with the $7,000.

Schwartz isn’t broke anymore of course. His copywriting skills have been rated as about the best in the business, and included among his fans is Paul Michael. He commands considerable fees. “Before I pick up a pencil I get $3,500,” he says. And if the piece he creates pays off, the client shells out an additional $4,500. Among his triumphs: a campaign for a self propelled fishing lure, which purportedly made $500,000 for his client, and his ads for a newsletter called Boardroom Reports (“Read 300 Business Magazines in 30 minutes), which helped to sell 60,000 subscriptions at $36 a year.

Although he has been involved in a variety of mail-order products – “You name it, we’ve sold it” – Schwartz specializes in marketing information on self-help topics such as health, dieting, memory-aids, and money making. He runs a group of companies that sells this information in a variety of forms, including books, pamphlets, newsletters, audio cassettes, and video tapes. He says he most enjoys “mail order money machines – successful products that generate equally successful spin-offs. As he explain it, a book can lead to a newsletter, the testimonials for which can lead in turn to a catalog, all of which produce mailing lists of names which can be rented.

The practice of taking a book that has sold poorly in stores and promoting it successfully through mail order is now commonplace, but Schwartz claims to have originated this technique in 1961. How to Get Thinner Once and For All had sold only 7,500 copies in book store. After his mail order campaign sales rose to 150,000.

Back in the 1960’s Schwartz became involved in what he remembers as one of the greatest experiences of his life. Appalled by the fact that a group of black children who were bussed to a school on New York’s Eastside couldn’t read, he went to Harlem to teach remedial reading and also to find out why such a problem existed with obviously intelligent children. Typically, he found the answer, and later published, How to Double Your Childs Grade in School. Although he didn’t publish a book about it, four years of teaching these kids gave him a chance to teach three, white, middle-class teachers a parallel lesson; he took them through a course in advanced algebra which left the three feeling how dumb they were, a major problem is why the kids couldn’t read. Then he explained how algebra worked, and the teachers self assessed dumbness vanished.

Schwartz’s working days fall into three different parts. In the afternoons, he goes to the office and runs his corporations. In the mornings he stays home, thinking up concepts and writing copy. Sometimes at night, even, he will leap out of bed, rush to his book lined den and scribble down the ideas and themes which woke him. He keeps a diary in which he records such themes; on the second day of the month, he already filled out half a page.

Schwartz believes that mail-order’s “get-rich-quick” reputation is a fair one. “This is still one of the most accessible and easily entered of all businesses. Anybody can do it. All you have to know are the techniques and traps,” he says. He says it’s impossible to lose unless you go crazy – and yet at the same time believes that an element of craziness is necessary to be really creative. But, “you don’t have to be intelligent to be brilliant,” he says. “Brilliance can be taught and learned.”

Schwartz and his wife, who is a successful interior designer, live in a sumptuous apartment on Park Avenue. Their home is filled with their collection of modern American Paintings and Sculpture and in fact was decorated to complement the art.

Being broke is a memory even though Schwartz doesn’t believe that he himself is any different today even though he is one of the country’s top-paid copywriters. He points out that his father always said he had no money sense – and died disappointed.

John Quincy Adams' Twitter AccountSixth President of the United States, John Quincy Adams, may have died in 1848 but that doesn’t stop the man from tweeting.

In an elegant little PR stroke, the Massachusetts Historical Society has launched a Twitter account, JQAdams_MHS, and has officially started tweeting Adams’ personal diary entries, beginning with his trip to Russia on August 5, 1809 as U.S. Minister to Russia.

As the A.P.reported: “a high school student touring the sixth U.S. president’s archives recently noticed his bite-sized diary entries looked a lot like tweets.”

Filed under Twitter Marketing by  #

The year was 1969…the place was Manhattan.

While flower children were frolicking in nearby Central Park, an unusual event was taking place at the Commodore Hotel in midtown.

The event was called the “Seminar for Future Millionaires.” Yes, long before Joe Sugarman, Gary Halbert and Jay Abraham set foot on a seminar stage, mail order magnate, Joseph Cossman gave the first direct marketing seminar for the general public.

Even though this ad is nearly forty years old, it’s not very different from most seminar promotions today…except perhaps it’s better written and gets to the point in 1/10th the time.

Of course, Joe Cossman hired the best copywriter for the task, Gene Schwartz.

Today, a million doesn’t sound like much, especially with the US dollar slipping 16% this year. But at that time, it was worth close to $7 million in 2007 terms (and convertible to gold.)

So the claim and title of the seminar were a strong pull and backed up by world class copy.

This is your personal invitation to a “Seminar for Future Millionaires.” It is given by America’s most successful “Start-from-Nothing-Millionaire”…E. Joseph Cossman, who started a spare-time business for himself with a kitchen table for his desk, a few hundred dollars and an idea. And who today, at the age of 49, has retired with over $1,000,000!

And the most important fact of all…Joe Cossman made this one million dollars, almost completely by mail order, using other people’s effort and money and in less than a few years from the time he was working as a $65-a-week shipping clerk with “no future.”

Let me repeat this fact again: Just a few golden secrets — secrets you are going to learn at the Commodore Hotel in Manhattan on Saturday, April 26th netted this man over $1,000,000

Gene Schwartz’s bullets are terrific. I like this one:

  • An introduction to one of the cleverest (and laziest) men in the United States. He works from 4:30 to 7:30 five nights a week — and earns over $12,000 a year. His gimmick: a stroll through a shopping center parking lot, a couple of part-time high school kids, and an irresistible message written on a 5-inch by 8-inch card.

Among the things I’d love to know about this event are:

  • What was the turnout?
  • Who were the attendees? (Was an adolescent Jay Abraham scratching his goatee in the third row?)
  • If there were product sales…were they as shameless and vulgar as they are today?

I’m afraid we’ll never know.

Here is: “One Day With This Man Could Make You Rich!”

100 Good Advertising HeadlinesMany moons ago, one of the sharpest copywriters in the world wanted to drum up business for his ad agency.

What did he do?

He created a massive, two-page advertising spread of 100 headlines he handpicked as the most instructive ever written.

The copywriter was Victor Schwab and the timeless compilation of headlines and thumbnail analyses he put together are a must for anyone serious about creating great headlines.

It’s worth reading theses headlines in their original layout, so after you’ve scanned the scrumptious headlines below, you can print out the ad to keep on your desk for quick reference.

100 Good Advertising Headlines (1-megabyte PDF) This is a 3,000+ word ad, so if you choose to print it out, you’ll need larger paper or just use the magnifier in your PDF Reader.

1. THE SECRET OF MAKING PEOPLE LIKE YOU

Almost $500,000 was spent profitably to run keyed ads displaying this headline. It drew many hundreds of thousands of readers into the body matter of a “people-mover” advertisement — one which, by itself, built a big business. Pretty irresistible, isn’t it?

2. A LITTLE MISTAKE THAT COST A FARMER $3,000 A YEAR

A sizable appropriation was spent successfully in farm magazines on this ad. Sometimes the negative idea of offsetting, reducing, or eliminating the “risk of loss” is even more attractive to the reader than the “prospect of gain.”

As the great business executive Chauncey Depew once said, “I would not stay up all of one night to make $100; but I would stay up all of seven nights to keep from losing it.” As Walter Norvath says in Six Successful Selling Techniques, “People will fight much harder to avoid losing something they already own than to gain something of greater value that they do not own.” It is also true that they have the feeling that losses and waste can often be more easily retrieved than new profits can be gained.

What farmer could pass up reading the copy under such a headline — to find out: “What was the mistake? Why was it ‘little’? Am I making it? If it cost a farmer a loss of $3,000 a year, maybe it’s costing me a lot more? Perhaps the copy will also tell me about other mistakes I might be making.”More on 100 Good Advertising Headlines (by Victor Schwab)

Filed under Advertising Headlines by  #

Many today connote direct response with enlargment pills, acai berries and colon cleansers.

Let them.

Here’s a yesteryear presentation by the Scottish high priest of direct response, David Ogilvy (heralded by trumpets).

Interestingly, the chasm between direct response and general advertising that Ogilvy mentions is just as wide as when he gave this presentation over thirty years ago. And were it not for the Internet clearly demonstrating the ineptitude and shortcomings of most Fortune 500 advertising, they’d still be in the dark.

The boldings are mine. I certainly echo the sentiment that, “Your timing is perfect. You’ve come in the direct response business at the right moment in history.” Though it would be insane for most to capitalize on this timing at an agency. Get in front of your computer and put on your thinking cap.

I wish I could be with you today, in the flesh as they say. Unfortunately, I’m in India. Ever been in India? It’s very hot. If you don’t mind, I’m going to take off my coat.

You know, in the advertising community today, there are two worlds — your world of direct response advertising, and that other world, the world of general advertising.

These two worlds are on a collision course. You direct response people know what kind of advertising works and what doesn’t work. You know it to a dollar. The general advertising people don’t know.

You know that too many commercials on television are more effective — more cost effective — than 10 second commercials or 30 second commercials. You know that fringe time on television sells more than prime time. In print advertising, you know that long copy sells more than short copy. You know, that headlines and copy about the product and its benefits sell more than cute headlines and poetic copy. You know it to a dollar.

The general advertisers and their agencies know almost nothing for sure because they cannot measure the results of their advertising. They worship at the alter of creativity, which really means originality, the most dangerous word in the lexicon of advertising. They opine that 30-second commercials are more cost effective than two-minute commercials. You know they’re wrong.  In print advertising, they opine that short commercials (whoever prepared the teleprompter presentation goofed, obviously he meant ads) sell more than long copy. You know they’re wrong. They indulge in entertainment. You know they’re wrong. You know to a dollar. They don’t.

Why don’t you tell them?

Why don’t you save them from their follies?

For two reasons:

First, because you are impressed by the fact they are so big and so well paid and so well publicized. You are even, perhaps, impressed by their reputation for creativity, whatever that may mean. Second, you never meet them. You inhabit a different world. The chasm between direct response advertising and general advertising is wide.

On your side of the chasm, I see knowledge and reality. On the other side of the chasm, I see ignorance. You are the professionals. This must not go on. I predict that the practitioners of general advertising are going to start learning from your experience. They’re going to start picking your brains. I see no reason why the direct response divisions of agencies should be separate from the main agencies. Some of you may remember when television agencies were kept separate. Wasn’t that idiotic? I expect to see the direct response people become an integral part of all agencies. You have more to teach them than they have to teach you. You have it in your power to rescue the advertising business from its manifold lunacies.

When I was 25, I took a correspondence course in direct mail. I bought it out my own pocket from the Dardanelle Corporation in Chicago. Direct response is my first love, and later it became my secret weapon. When I started a Ogilvy & Mather in New York, nobody had heard of us, but we were airborne within six months and grew at record speed. How did we achieve that? By using my secret weapon, direct mail.

Every four weeks, I sent personalized mailings to our new business prospects, and I was always amazed to discover how many of our clients had been attracted to Ogilvy & Mather by those mailings. That was how we grew.

Whenever I look at an advertisement in a magazine or newspaper, I can tell at a glance whether the writer has had any direct response experience. If he writes short copy or literary copy, it is obvious that he has never had the discipline to write direct response. If he has had that discipline, he wouldn’t make those mistakes. Nobody should be allowed to create general advertising until he has severed his apprenticeship in direct response. That experience will keep his feet on the ground for the rest of his life.

You know the trouble with many copywriters and general agencies is that they don’t really think in terms of selling. They’ve never written direct response, they’ve never tasted blood. Until recently, direct response was the “Cinderella” of the advertising world. Then came the computer and the credit card, and direct marketing exploded. You guys are coming into your own. Your opportunities are colossal. In the audience today, there are heads of some general agencies. I offer you this advice; insist that all your people, creative, media, account executives, that they’re all trained in your direct response division. If you don’t have such a division, make arrangements with a firm of directing marketing specialist to train your people. And make it a rule in your agency that no copy is ever presented to clients before it has been vetted by a direct response expert.

Ladies and gentlemen, I envy you. Your timing is perfect. You’ve come in the direct response business at the right moment in history. You’re on to a good thing.

For 40 years, I’ve been a voice crying in the wilderness, trying to get my fellow advertising practitioners to take direct response seriously. Today, my first love is coming into its own. You face a golden future.

Filed under Blog by  #

“An Open Letter To Every Man And Woman In America Who Wants To Have Better Sex Without Feeling Guilty” was a full page ad written by Gary for Dr. Ross Stewart’s training tape and had many insertions around 1995.

The price of the VHS tape was $69.95 and it’s likely the $4.00 s&h covered not only the shipping but the cost of production of the tape, as well.

We miss old Gary.

He could sell a sex training tape as agilely as a financial newsletter subscription, a skin cream or a business opportunity.

Click on the thumbnail to download the 265 KB PDF

Filed under Gary Halbert Copywriting Swipe File by  #

Register Login