A client I hadn’t heard from in a while contacted me at the end of last year.
He had a print ad pulling a very respectable three times ad cost and wondered if he could get it even higher.
His objective went beyond merely trying to bump response since he was close to getting his product in a national retail chain, and he was looking for the tipping point to get there.
But as bright an aura as his ad seemed to have, it also cast a dark shadow.
The market clearly wanted the benefits his product offered. But for a large segment of them, it meant accepting a disadvantage they assumed went along with the benefits.
I’m an eternal optimist but when he told me his ad was doing 3-to-1, I didn’t hold out high hopes for significant improvement given his media costs. So it was a relief to spot some low hanging fruit when I finally got my hands on the ad.
It was time for the old…
“With-Without” Formula
As in, with all the benefits showered on you… but without any of the drawbacks.
In these cases, with the dark shadow of some assumed disadvantage looming in the background, there’s no time to mess around and address it in the fine print.
You’ve got to let the market know they get everything they want without the thing they clearly don’t want, and do so right away.
I made only two changes to the control ad.
Anyone in the alt-health and supplement business can’t help but notice the growing trend of wrongful death cases.
The “mystery monk” got his first taste of energy drink ten years ago at a trade show.


Earlier this week, I received the belated and sad news of the passing of my friend and colleague, Christian Godefroy. I last heard from him on November 2nd and he suffered a fatal heart attack two weeks later on November 17th.

